Health data protection comes with pitfalls when it comes to everything


Health data is the deepest kukla of the nesting doll that is personal digital privacy, and despite some efforts, its protection is not improving much.

Developments in the United States, European Union, and China are examples of half measures, complexity over complexity, and state security that inadvertently contribute to private data leaks, respectively.

An article by tech culture publication Wired examines the US Privacy and Data Protection Bill, which has been described as America’s best hope for actually protecting biometrics and other forms of privacy.

The expiring bill takes the heavier hand with targeted advertising, a scourge for privacy advocates, who could be barred from processing biometric data.

That would be good news for American women who fought for control of personal health data before the Supreme Court struck down abortion rights.

The Brookings Institution think tank, in a lengthy article listing data privacy threats, notes that a company that had built rule-tracking apps was forced to settle in a Federal Trade case. Commission in which the company sold data to Facebook, Google and others. .

And while the legislation allows for some exceptions when it comes to getting ahead of state laws and regulations (Illinois’ biometric information privacy law would likely be one of them), the draft would limit a private right of action. , which could tear out the targeted ads provisions.

In the EU, two data protection offices in the government are having problems with the proposed European health data space. If approved by the European Commission, it will finalize a so-called European Health Union for the secure use and reuse of health data for the benefit of all EU citizens.

Andrea Jelinek, chair of the European Data Protection Board, issued a statement pointing out that the privacy rights in the proposed health data space conflict with those created by the General Data Protection Regulation. .

Taking a step back, Jelinek and data protection supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski expressed optimism that consumers could have more control over their biometric data. But in this situation, it would come with another layer of regulation on the processing of health data.

Considering the mess and sometimes reckless efforts to protect health data in Europe and America may lead the most committed democrat to wish for a bit of autocracy.

But China’s autocratic surveillance state appears to have digitally monitored itself in weak cybersecurity. Because much of it is centralized under government control, drops of personal information can be collected and sold after a single successful attack.

A the wall street journal article collected numerous examples of data breaches within its borders, one of which involved a block of 1 billion citizen files stolen from Shanghai police. And they were all for sale.

The newspaper says it has witnessed tens of thousands of databases in China that are online without any security. More than 700 terabytes of data are exposed, a total unmatched by any other country. The United States is a close second.

It’s important to note Shanghai above, as this city pioneered the collection of a mind-boggling database. This includes public health care, security and transportation. The Journal says all the information was fed into an AI platform.

Article topics

biometric data | biometrics | China | data protection | EU | legislation | confidentiality | United States


Comments are closed.